Peaches for Father Francis by Joanne Harris

Peaches for Father Francis by Joanne Harris
original title: Peaches for Monsieur le Curé¹
series: Chocolat trilogy (3)

I am no longer the Vianne Rocher who blew into town eight years ago. [...] I am in charge of my destiny. I call the wind. It answers to me.(23)

While I've read quite a bit of Harris' oeuvre, I've never gotten around to her most famous novel, Chocolat.² Peaches for Father Francis is the third book to feature characters from Chocolat. I haven't read Chocolat's first sequel, The Girl with No Shadow,³ either. To my mind, Peaches for Father Francis functions perfectly well as a stand along novel, though a a familiarity with Chocolat's storyline and characters is useful to the reader.

The primary action of Peaches for Father Francis takes place in Lansquenet-sous-Tannes, the fictional French village that was the setting of Chocolat (The Girl with No Shadow takes place in Paris, which is where Peaches for Father Francis begins). A letter from her now-deceased friend Armande Voizin summons protagonist Vianne back to Lansquenet, which Armande suspects will be in need of Vivianne's help by the time the letter is delivered to her. When Vianne arrives in Lansquenet much has changed in the village. The storefront where she sold chocolate once upon a time is now being used as a small Muslim girls school or was until a recent arson attack. The primary suspect in the attack is Vianne's old nemesis (and the novel's second protagonist), village curate Reynaud Francis.

Reynaud finds an unlikely ally in Vianne, who is quick to surmise that all is not as it seems in Lansquenet.  Peaches for Father Francis is classic Harris. Her prose is gorgeous, evocative, and tinged with magic. The story, which revolves around the problems caused by prejudice within a community affected by conservatism within and self-segregation of its (Moroccan Muslim) immigrant population, is timely. The novel's themes--which include tolerance and forgiveness, was is vs. what seems to be, the inevitability of change--are timeless.

Here's a quote from Reynaud that struck me:

Of course, I know God has a plan. But in recent years I've found it increasingly hard to believe that the plan is running as smoothly as He intended. The more I think about it now, the more I see God as a harried bureaucrat, wanting to help, but crippled by paperwork and committees. If He sees us at all, [...] it is from behind a desk piled high with accounts and works-in-progress. That's why He has priests to do His work, and bishops to oversee them.  [...] But try to juggle too many balls, and this is what happens.  Some go astray. (244)

A couple other truisms from the novel:

Love is random, centreless; striking out like pestilence. (268)

Vianne: But we have the uncanny knack of focusing on difference; as if excluding others could make our identity stronger. But in all my travels, I have found that people are mostly the same everywhere. Under the veil, the beard, the soutane, it's always the same machinery. (221)

Peaches for Father Francis is a must-read for lovers of Harris and/or Chocolat. Despite its timeliness I'm not sure that I'd recommend Peaches for Father Francis as an introduction to Harris' work since it builds upon groundwork laid in Chocolat (and probably also in The Girl with No Shadow). Rather I'd recommend Peaches for Father Francis in conjunction with Chocolat.

Because we all know that I like footnotes -

1. Because apparently Americans can't handle a little bit of French.
   Why, oh why, do publishers think the American audience needs a different title? I really do think that the confusion this causes outweighs any possible benefit. I'd much rather have an explanatory note in the front matter than an alternate title.
2. Though, for what it's worth, I did see the film adaptation.
3. The Lollipop Shoes was the original title. Does lollipop have some alternate meaning across the pond? (rhetorical question; see footnote 1)

disclosure: I received a review copy of Peaches for Father Francis from Viking Press via NetGalley.

Recent reading

Despite my lack of posts recently, I have been reading. Here's what:

Adam Haberberg by Yasmina Reza
I reviewed this portrait of a mid-life crisis for Library Journal.
Forty-seven year old Adam Haberberg is a washed-up novelist. Depressed at the death of his loyal publisher, his loveless marriage, and his recently-diagnosed macular degeneration, Haberberg is slumped on a bench at the zoo when he is recognized by an old classmate. Despite the fact that he hasn’t seen this woman in thirty years, the hapless protagonist agrees to spend the evening with her. Although an interesting character, Haberberg’s over-the-top neuroses take away from readers’ ability to relate to him and distract from the nuggets of wisdom hidden in his stream of consciousness.

Bad Boys in Kilts by Donna Kaufmann
A contemporary romance collection featuring a trio of Scotsmen.
The one problem with reading these three stories in such quick succession is that the similarities between them were way too obvious. I liked the Chisholm brothers (at least the three that we "meet" in this collection) and their respective leading ladies. I also enjoyed the fact that "Night Watch" had an epilogue that was really an epilogue for all three stories.
"Bottoms Up" is the story that I liked best. In the other two, in my personal opinion, the relationships didn't have sufficient build-up. I know that this is fiction and that there are built-in happily-ever-afters, but I was a bit unhappy that both Daisy and Bree just fell into bed with their Chisholm.

Holy Fools by Joanne Harris
Set in 17th-century France against a backdrop of terror and religious frenzy. Juliette seeks refuge in a remote abbey - and reinvents herself as Soeur Auguste. Then her past turns up to haunt her in the guise of a man she has every reason to fear.
I listed to the audio version of this book and I have to admit that I just wasn't crazy about it. I found it a bit tedious, especially in the middle. I think I may have liked it better in print, but I'm not sure.
One thing that really bothered me is that at a certain point it seems like Juliet almost forgets about Fleur in the midst of all the drama at the abbey and that just seemed completely out of character for her.

Tamarind Mem by Anita Rau Badami
Set in the exotic railway colonies of India, this bestselling Canadian novel tells a story of the ties of love and resentment that bind a mother and daughter.
This book was a slow read for me. I enjoyed the different perspectives, but it definitely seemed like there was less of the amma's prespective than of Kamini's (though I didn't check the page count to see if that was actually the case). I do wish we could have learned more about Paul da Costa; his presence was an undercurrent throughout the book, but we really never learn enough about him and about his relationship to the family (at least one of the things I thought was hinted at earlier in the book didn't seem to be true at all); and, what we do learn in Saroja's section of the book seems inconsistent (the women in the train seem to be reacting to a different story that the one we are getting from her).